|
|
Post by hills420 on Jan 21, 2006 12:59:07 GMT -5
Since the release of this new software, I thought it would be cool to post everyones scores (please specify the options as well).
|
|
|
|
Post by unknowngod430 on Jan 21, 2006 13:35:48 GMT -5
i haven't gotten it yet but i'll be sure to do so... im curious to see what you got considering out setups seem very similar.. differences are you have a 3.6 and i have a 3.4 but i have my video card overclocked to at least 550/580 so
|
|
|
|
Post by TRow on Jan 21, 2006 13:41:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by TRow on Jan 21, 2006 14:00:29 GMT -5
Compare this link: service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=31154This user has almost the exact same system I do, he has a Winchester Core, I have a Venice. His video card is slightly clocked higher, and his vcore is naturally higher. |
|
|
|
Post by hills420 on Jan 21, 2006 23:07:31 GMT -5
I think my rig is screwed up. My total score was 2144 (WTF). SM2.0 was 1108 and CPU was 1045.I re-installed everything less than a month ago. I chose the default settings, selected all tests and ran the test 3 times.
During the tests, Task Manager showed only one CPU at 100%, the other CPU was idle (HT is enabled). My GPU highest temp was 61 degrees and the GPU env. highest temp was 42 degrees. I am using Catalyst 5.11.
Does anyone have an idea why my score is so low? Should I turn off HT? Has anyone had any luck with Catalyst 6.1?
EDIT: Upgraded to Catalyst 6.1 and turned off HT, decreased my score to 2134, the SM2.0 score was 1108 and CPU score was 940.
|
|
|
|
Post by hills420 on Jan 21, 2006 23:14:25 GMT -5
Is that your rig TROW? If so, what happened to the XPS  |
|
|
|
Post by TRow on Jan 22, 2006 5:20:41 GMT -5
Yep, thats my Rig with a single core for now. I got my eye on a opteron 165 until the M2 socket comes out.
The XPS looks like a pull. Mobo, Case, PSU. Interested in owning history, PM me.
|
|
|
|
Post by hills420 on Jan 22, 2006 18:10:22 GMT -5
Removed CAtalyst 6.1 and went with Omega's v6.1. I also turned back on HT. My score was 2163, 1122 for SM2.0 and 1029 for CPU. My GPU high temp was in the high 50's, I may try OC'ing it a little more since I am maintaining low temps. I figure I have 10 degrees of playing room |
|
|
|
Post by TRow on Jan 23, 2006 14:46:31 GMT -5
Nvidia Driver Test:
Detonator 81.95 - 4103
502/1.2
Detonator 81.98 - 3967
508/1.22
|
|
|
|
Post by crusier on Jan 24, 2006 19:37:28 GMT -5
From what I have read there is a huge hit on ATI video cards......so keep it apples and oranges when comparing those scores.
|
|
|
|
Post by hills420 on Jan 24, 2006 20:51:17 GMT -5
From what I have read there is a huge hit on ATI video cards......so keep it apples and oranges when comparing those scores. that would explain it... |
|
|
|
Post by crusier on Jan 26, 2006 4:50:09 GMT -5
no oc's here and 1844 3dmarks, 1029 sm2.0, and 591 cpu
|
|
|
|
Post by unknowngod430 on Jan 26, 2006 9:31:20 GMT -5
yea thats about what i got.. with no overclocking however my computeres been fuxored lately so ill post up when i re do them
|
|
|
|
Post by Dhruv on Jan 28, 2006 0:53:19 GMT -5
Just tested my XPS Gen 4, my scores were................
3DMark Score(3DMarks)2169
SM 2.0 Score(Marks) 130
SM 3.0 Score (Marks)N/A
CPU Score(Marks)1000
Detailed Test Results
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon(FPS)8.561
2 - Firefly Forest (FPS)10.278
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley (FPS)0.317
CPU2 - Red Valley(FPS)0.504
Display Information
Graphics ChipsetATI RADEON X850 XT PE
Driver NameRADEON X850 Series
Driver Version6.14.10.6587
Driver StatusWHQL - FM Approved
Video Memory258 MB
Core Clock540 MHz
Memory Clock587 MHz
Everything is stock and no overclocking done. So the scores are good, bad.....ugly???
|
|
|
|
Post by rushey on Apr 7, 2006 6:57:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by onion on Jul 2, 2006 8:51:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mucklebum on Apr 11, 2008 15:24:53 GMT -5
|
|
